CAVR Choking Editorial - 02/01/2007
Choking is a big problem and it is getting worse! Why?
1> AVN
AVN has taken a pass on this subject. They promised a position on
this over two years ago. They continue to give Editor's Choices
to movies with choking in them and some even get trophies!
Why does AVN promote choking by giving awards for it. And, more
importantly, why doesn't AVN take a stand against choking?
2> Agents
Agents send their gals out to make movies that contain choking
and female degradation.
Why would an agent send it's bread and butter gals out to make
movies with this dangerous activity?
3> Critics
Most reviewers don't even mention when a movie has choking in it.
How totally irresponsible!
Why not tell the truth and deduct points for it.
Critics need to take a stand on choking.
4> Directors
Directors need to stand up and be counted. It is really worth
it to include choking in a movie?
Why take the risk? Some directors have 'no choking' policy
and they have paid the price for it. They are shunned by AVN
and by reviewers. They never get any trophies & very few
nominations.
5> Stars - Guys
They are generally the over-the-hill gang that feels it make
them a man.
Why the fantasy of seeing a 40+ years old man choking out an
18 year old gal?
6> Stars - Gals
They are into anything that will make $ for themselves. Safety
and sanity is not a part of their vocabulary.
Why they do it is most likely to assure that they continue
to get work.
7> Studios
Studios will not take a position on choking. They don't
want to rock the boat.
Why do some Studios not allow choking and they take the
heat for it?
8> Lawyers.
Most lawyers will not discuss this and I am not sure
why.
Why do some lawyers take a very vocal position on this
and flat out will not allow choking?
9> Fans.
The fans have spoken with their pocketbooks. They are
fed up with the choking and female degradation.
Why are sales down? Some of it has to be the radical
turn porn has taken.
10> Retail Stores/Distributors.
Most retail stores don't want movies with choking in
them. They are afraid of the legal problems.
Why do some distributors refuse to handle some of
the controversial releases?
11> XRCO.
The refuse to take a position against choking and put
the responsibility on their members.
Why do they give trophies to movies that have choking
in them?
Worst Case Scenario:
=====================================================================
A 40+ year old male is on set with 18 year old
newbie-of-the-year wanna be.
He proceeds to do his thing and chokes the gal.
He slips (or, some kind of problem) and she dies!
Oops, guess what folks, we now have what the government
has been wanting for many years, a snuff movie!
And then what will happen?
Choker..............Involuntary Manslaughter: 5-7 years!
Civil suit: A big judgment for the
deceased gal's parents.
Director............Accessory to crime: 2-4 years!
Civil suit: A big judgment for the
deceased gal's parents.
Studio..............Possible criminal charges.
Civil suit: A big judgment for the
deceased gal's parents.
Agent...............Accessory to crime. 1-2 years!
Civil suit: A big judgment for the
deceased gal's parents.
Adult Industry......Will be a major scandal with the
government getting involved and will
be a real mess. Choking DVDs will be
pulled and returned to distributors
and to Studios. It will be a field
day for the religious right. It will
not be a knockout to the business, but
it will set us back 10 years! All the
good positive gradual acceptance into
the mainstream will be lost.
I hope and pray that this never happens to one of our ladies or to
any of the fans watching a movie and deciding to try this at home.
We don't need to lose anyone. Do we really want to go through this?
Is it really that important that we include 15 to 30 seconds of
choking?
Somebody needs to stand up and say No, stop it!
Paul Fishbein?
Larry Flynt?
John Stagliano?
Samantha Lewis?
Gene Ross?
Patrick Collins?
Dirty Bob?
Note: I am not a lawyer and the criminal penalties are only a guess.